HIPAA HITETCH Compliance Blog Archive
Editing, adopting, and implementing NIST poilicies creates quarterly NIST CSF risk assessments in the Jumpstart program.
Why do you need NIST CSF even if you already have HITRUST CSF? Management and the board of directors may require NIST CSF.
The simplest HIPAA checklist is a quarterly NIST CSF risk assessment. It reflects that you have edited and implemented NIST policies, documented staff training and updated your NIST CSF risk assessment.
Trying to do an official certified NIST risk assessment from HIPAA policies written in the past is like translating hieroglyphics into English. The pathway to a Certified NIST Risk Assessment is having NIST policies in place. A NIST policy is one written to address a specific safeguard on the NIST CyberSecurity Framework (CSF).
A certified NIST risk assessment is your best proof of HIPAA compliance. Jumpstart delivers a quarterly certified NIST risk assessment.
A NIST CSF is a National Institute of Standards and Technology Cyber Security Framework which can deliver an equivalent to "HIPAA Certification". By meeting the standards including periodic risk assessments you can provide proof that you are doing all that is needed to protect PHI.
A risk assessment on the NIST CyberSecurity Framework (CSF) is your "certification" of HIPAA compliance. It demonstrates the status of your security and privacy programs to others such as regulators, customers, partners, and shareholders.
The NIST Framework works best when linked with NIST Policies and a cycle of reviewing and updating policies to match changes in the organization. We call this the Cycle of Compliance.
HIPAA policies need to be built on a Cyber Security Framework (CSF) to be valid. Old policies written by consultants, lawyers, in-house IT, or bought off the internet do not meet the new CSF standards.
Audit Finds Millions Paid Inappropriately Due to Lack of a Risk Assessment. Under the HITECH Act meaningful use incentive program, conducting a security risk assessment of protected health information "created or maintained by the certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities" is a core requirement.
A ransomware attack can trigger a series of bad events leading to a huge HIPAA fine. The slippery slope: Ransomware attack is a HIPAA breach, which when reported triggers an audit, that discovers a lack of an up to date risk assessment, which leads to a fine for willful neglect.
Metro Community Provider Network received a $400,000 fine and a corrective action plan for failing to do a risk assessment prior to a phishing incident that exposed 3200 employee files. Doing the risk assessment a month after the breach didn't work.
Compliance Helper offers the NIST framework at a fraction of the cost of HITRUST. Assure compliance with HIPAAssure®, built on the NIST framework, delivered in the SaaS method, and with the Helper methodology to reduce cost.
An up to date HIPAA risk assessment is the one single proof of HIPAA compliance that can prevent huge fines and possible jail time. No matter what else you have done if you don't have an official (NIST) and up to date (at least annually) HIPAA risk assessment you are probably in willful neglect.
Willful Neglect of HIPAA compliance has caused companies to go bankrupt. How would you handle a six figure penalty from OCR?
“We’re doing more investigations of smaller breaches … I think you’re going to see more of that in terms of entities with whom we enter corrective action plans,” reiterated Deven McGraw, Esq., OCR deputy director of health information privacy at the 88th annual American Health Information Management (AHIMA) conference held October 16-19 in Baltimore, MD
An up do date risk assessment is a key element in your MIPS Composite Performance Score. The MACRA Act which was passed with bilateral support in Congress uses the MIPS score to determine reimbursement for practices.
Leaving 31,800 patient records open and accessible on the Internet cost St Josephs Hospital a $7.5 million dollar settlement of a class action suit and a $2.145 million dollar fine from OCR. Quarterly risk assessments might have revealed the problem sooner or prevented it from happening at all.